🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 670+ reviews
Fashion ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Y2k Mono Lens Shield Vintage Sunglasses Blazer

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5 (670 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6341
$10568.33
Sale
✓ no-cost shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Y2k Mono Lens Shield Vintage Sunglasses Blazer

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

Y2k Mono Lens Shield Vintage Sunglasses Blazer

Y2k Mono Lens Shield Vintage Sunglasses Blazer​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Fashion products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 76930293

Category: Fashion > Products >

Original Price: $10568.33 USD

Sale Price: $6341 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 2929 reviews
MD
Maria Davis ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Fresno, CA
★★★★★
Highly satisfied
Really adore this item. I use it more than I thought I would. Couldn't be more pleased!
41 people found this helpful
BG
Betty Gray ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Denver, CO
★★★★★
Absolutely fancy it
This is a must-have! The design is up-to-date and sleek. A wise investment!
10 people found this helpful
JJ
Jeffrey Jackson ✓ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago · Pittsburgh, PA
★★★★☆
Couldn't be happier
Really happy I got this. It works flawlessly every time I use it. fabulous product, great seller!
39 people found this helpful
SC
Susan Cox ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Boston, MA
★★★★★
Worth every penny
Fantastic quality! I've been using it daily and it holds up fabulous. really impressed overall.
20 people found this helpful
KW
Kenneth Williams ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Memphis, TN
★★★★★
Absolutely appreciate it
flawless for my needs. I've been using it daily and it holds up terrific. Totally worth it!
21 people found this helpful