๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 277+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

JXREMI OFF SHOULDER - Jumper

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.2 out of 5 (277 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20​
$33.33
Sale
โœ“ no-cost shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Neckline : Off-the-shoulderPattern : PlainArticle number : JJ621D08S-Q11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift shipment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

JXREMI OFF SHOULDER - Jumper

Neckline : Off-the-shoulder
Pattern : Plain
Article number : JJ621D08S-Q11​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1601710

Category: Women > Clothing > Knitwear & Cardigans

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price: $20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 8635 reviews
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Portland, OR
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Absolutely faultless
it feels solid enough and it works for me.
26 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Omaha, NE
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
definitely impressed
After several use, it is uncomplicated to use and Iโ€™m satisfied.
28 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 days ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply incredible
The JXREMI OFF SHOULDER - Jumper feels reasonably well made.
33 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Jacksonville, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
really happy​
Personally, the JXREMI OFF SHOULDER - Jumper feels okay so no complaints. Works fine so far.
11 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Memphis, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
really happy
Honestly, the JXREMI OFF SHOULDER - Jumper works fine which is good enough.
29 people found this helpful