🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 781+ reviews
Outdoor βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Kids' Gardening Gloves

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5 (781 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$4
$6.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

2 pairs of Circo (from Target) child-size gardening gloves in bright striped pattern. Never used, tag still attached.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment

↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Kids' Gardening Gloves

2 pairs of Circo (from Target) child-size gardening gloves in bright striped pattern. Never used, tag still attached.

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1095722

Category: Outdoor > Garden Protective Gear > Gardening Gloves

Original Price:$6.67 USD

Sale Price: $4 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 transport & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8116 reviews
JD
John Davidson
2 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
The Kids' Gardening Gloves quality is acceptable.
11 people found this helpful​
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding!
Honestly, it performs as expected and I don’t regret it.
48 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
finest
I had no trouble setting up the Kids' Gardening Gloves.
21 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly advocate!
The Kids' Gardening Gloves feels solid enough for regular use.​
20 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly advocate!
The Kids' Gardening Gloves looks straightforward, but functionally it’s fine.
33 people found this helpful