🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 474+ reviews
Vintage āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller

Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.8 out of 5 (474 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20​
$33.33
Sale
āœ“ no-cost shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage Semca wind up travel alarm Clark. Unsure if keeps accurate time, but cute vintage display piece

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
ā†©ļø
straightforward Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock

Vintage Semca wind up travel alarm Clark. Unsure if keeps accurate time, but cute vintage display piece​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 605152

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Clocks

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price: $20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

āœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 474 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
astonishing Quality
After a few days, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock works fine which feels reasonable. Works fine so far.
MK
Megan King āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
marvelous Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock!
After a few days, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock feels solid and it meets expectations.
AC
Amber Carter āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
fancy this Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock!
So far, it is practical which feels reasonable.
DC
Daniel Clark āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Exactly What I Needed
reliable and good price Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock.
JM​
Jessica Moore āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
ultimate Purchase Ever
At first, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock works fine so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.