🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 768+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (768 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$21.28
$35.47
Sale
βœ“ no-cost shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Comes with Original Box in Original Styrofoam Packaging in Pristine Condition !!! Working Mechanical Clock: Item winds and works perfectlyThis is a vintage 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Timer Model #8239It is a reliable and efficient tool for photographers looking to develop their filmsThe timer is designed with a red color scheme and features swivels for effortless operationHas mount hole to hang on the wallThe item measures 4.5 inches in height and width, and weighs 1 poundIt is a United States product and is ideal for those interested in film photographyThis analog timer is ideal for use in the darkroom and is sure to enhance your photography experienceMAKE OFFER !!!! Check Out My Other Listings….. BUNDLE AND SAVE !!!Comes from smoke-free and pet-free clean home. Packaged with Care and Ready to Ship !!1/13

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution
↩️
elementary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239

Comes with Original Box in Original Styrofoam Packaging in Pristine Condition !!!

Working Mechanical Clock: Item winds and works perfectly

This is a vintage 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Timer Model #8239

It is a reliable and efficient tool for photographers looking to develop their films

The timer is designed with a red color scheme and features swivels for effortless operation

Has mount hole to hang on the wall

The item measures 4.5 inches in height and width, and weighs 1 pound

It is a United States product and is ideal for those interested in film photography

This analog timer is magnificent for use in the darkroom and is sure to enhance your photography experience

MAKE OFFER !!!!

Check Out My Other Listings…..
BUNDLE AND preserve !!!

Comes from smoke-no-cost and pet-free clean home.

Packaged with Care and Ready to Ship !!
1/13​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 263245

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Electronics

Original Price: $35.47 USD

Sale Price: $21.28 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8569 reviews
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
remarkable Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239!
The Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239 feels okay, nothing to complain about.
39 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239
From my experience, it feels solid enough so it’s acceptable.
44 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous find!
The Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239 feels okay, nothing to complain about.
14 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller
2 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
genuinely impressed
Honestly, the Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239 performs as expected and it meets expectations. Works fine so far.
27 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Sacramento, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
After various use, the Vintage Antique 1950s Eastman Kodak Darkroom Developing Clock Timer Model #8239 feels solid which is good enough. Works fine so far.
33 people found this helpful